Case Law Reviews

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 9

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 9

Read Hauptman Ham’s October 2025 IP Case Law Review covering treatment patents, prosecution disclaimer, jury verdicts, and USPTO eligibility guidance. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 8

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 8

Read Hauptman Ham’s September 2025 IP Case Law Review covering design patents, prosecution history, claim construction, and prosecution laches. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 7

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 7

Read Hauptman Ham’s July–August 2025 IP Case Law Review covering patent eligibility, claim construction, jury verdicts, and prosecution history. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 6

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 6

Read Hauptman Ham’s June 2025 IP Case Law Review covering machine learning patent eligibility, IPR petition requirements, and patent royalty evidence. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 5

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 5

Read Hauptman Ham’s May 2025 IP Case Law Review covering prosecution disclaimers, means-plus-function patent claims, and generic color trademarks. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 4

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 4

Explore Hauptman Ham's April 2025 Intellectual Property Case Law Review featuring key Federal Circuit decisions affecting patent and trademark law. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 3

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 3

The Federal Circuit limited “comprising tungsten” to elemental tungsten based on the specification, affirming the PTAB’s obviousness ruling despite the construction error. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 2

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 2

The Federal Circuit ruled that a patent need only describe what is claimed, reversing a written-description invalidity finding in litigation over Entresto. Read More

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 1

Case Law Review: Volume 11, No. 1

The Federal Circuit held that a detailed commercial “quotation” letter constituted an invalidating offer for sale under pre-AIA §102(b), clarifying on-sale bar standards. Read More

Contact Hauptman Ham, LLP for your intellectual property needs.